In a message dated 1/6/02 11:20:18 AM Eastern Standard Time,
paulc@mediaone.net writes:
> The RX-340 is superior to the Omni Six on the ham bands...period. The
> RX-340 is seemingly impossible to overload, the zero-overshoot DSP filter
> skirts are surgically precise, and 50+ DSP filter bandwidths can be
> selected. Under no conditions during the past six months has the Omni
> outperformed the RX-340 under and operating condition. Carl, N4PY has more
> direct experience in contesting conditions, but in weak-signal DX work, the
> RX-340 is unbeatable.
Okay, fair enough, I would hope with that kind of price difference the 340
would be superior to the Omni VI Plus. But how about a comparison for
receive between the RX-350 and the Omni VI Plus?
I do more listening than transmitting these days, and in fact do own an Omni
VI Plus and am looking seriously at the RX-350 for short-wave listening.
Currently I use a Sony ICF-2010 with the KIWA filters. I really want the
340 but I just can not justify the cash, plus size is a factor where I want
to place it.
Comments anyone? How is the AM Sync on the RX-350?
Thanks,
Michael, K5AWI
|