A Yahoo Group has been set up for the RX-350, but I don't know how
active it is.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rx350/
If you join the group and check the messages you can see opinions about
the receiver, although you may not see a comparison to the OMNI VI.
--
Mike - WB4HUC
Austin, TX
----- Original Message -----
From: <gr1ns@aol.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 11:22 AM
Subject: [TenTec] RX-350 Vs Omni VI Plus
> In a message dated 1/6/02 11:20:18 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> paulc@mediaone.net writes:
>
> > The RX-340 is superior to the Omni Six on the ham bands...period. The
> > RX-340 is seemingly impossible to overload, the zero-overshoot DSP
filter
> > skirts are surgically precise, and 50+ DSP filter bandwidths can be
> > selected. Under no conditions during the past six months has the Omni
> > outperformed the RX-340 under and operating condition. Carl, N4PY has
more
> > direct experience in contesting conditions, but in weak-signal DX work,
the
> > RX-340 is unbeatable.
>
>
> Okay, fair enough, I would hope with that kind of price difference the 340
> would be superior to the Omni VI Plus. But how about a comparison for
> receive between the RX-350 and the Omni VI Plus?
>
> I do more listening than transmitting these days, and in fact do own an
Omni
> VI Plus and am looking seriously at the RX-350 for short-wave listening.
> Currently I use a Sony ICF-2010 with the KIWA filters. I really want the
> 340 but I just can not justify the cash, plus size is a factor where I
want
> to place it.
>
> Comments anyone? How is the AM Sync on the RX-350?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael, K5AWI
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
|