A similar adjustment can be made on the 756 PRO by setting a filter to an SSB
default. Then SFT will show on the screed. Then use the PBT to narrow it down
to
your cw width. Bingo......hard and soft filter shapes. I would not spend
the extra $1000 for that soft/hard feature on the PRO II. 73/Tim Logan NZ7C
Quoting n4lq@iglou.com:
> I thought the percussive cw response was due to the steep sided filter
>
> shape in the default filter menu and required some adjusting. Then this
>
> was addressed in the Pro 2 and a soft/hard menu position was added.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>
> To: tentec@contesting.com
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 05:36:21 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: [TenTec] My own little "quiet test"
>
> > W5YR wrote:
> > "The PRO is flat from about 80 Hz to 3600 Hz. So, it
> > has the high-frequency response required to make noise
> > have that crisp, brittle "percussive" sound while the
> > K2 filters out the highs and the lows and
> > makes it sound softer."
> >
> > Interesting observation and I'm wondering if that
> > really explains what Tim was describing about the
> > percussive characteristics of the received cw. I also
> > notice that an FT-1000MP's received cw sounds
> > "percussive" (thumpy?), when compared to Ten-Tec and
> > some older radios around my shack. Perhaps it has
> > more to do with AGC response, detector or ??? than
> > merely audio bandwith. I prefer the non-percussive cw
> > note myself.
> >
> > Any other thoughts on this?
> >
> > 73,
> > Barry N1EU
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
> > http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
|