[TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews

To:	<tentec@contesting.com>
Subject:	[TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews
From:	mschellur@earthlink.net (M Schell)
Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2002 20:03:48 -0400

The one salient point that has been missed:  the ARRL reviews are the most
quantitative and definitive data available.  The data far surpasses the
depth of the discussions that occur on this list.

73,

Michael KF2LF

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews, M Schell <= [TenTec] ARRL reviews, Duane Grotophorst [TenTec] Writing about "sound", Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales [TenTec] Writing about "sound", Duane Grotophorst [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Bill Steffey NY9H [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Ed Tanton [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Stuart Rohre [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Stuart Rohre [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Jim Reid [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer

Previous by Date:	[TenTec] Ham Radio 101 course, K5BDZ@aol.com
Next by Date:	[TenTec] ARRL reviews, Bill Golden
Previous by Thread:	[TenTec] Ham Radio 101 course, K5BDZ@aol.com
Next by Thread:	[TenTec] ARRL reviews, Duane Grotophorst
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]