At 08:03 PM 04/10/2002 -0400, Michael wrote:
>The one salient point that has been missed: the ARRL reviews are the most
>quantitative and definitive data available. The data far surpasses the
>depth of the discussions that occur on this list.
Agreed. The ARRL has an in-house lab to do extreme levels of testing.
The other "magazines" do not have this and rely only on other individuals
to provide some type of review.... mostly subjective.
My "weighting scale" is 90% on tests and facts, 10% on reviewer's
comments.
Perry w8au
|