| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Enhanced SSB |
| From: | w8au@sssnet.com |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Apr 2003 20:20:42 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
At 03:16 PM 04/18/2003 -0400, Paul Christensen, Esq. wrote: > damping to let the microphone hear only the "golden tones" of the ham > transmitting. AM broadcast doesn't even allow going to 15 KHz.Prior to the implementation of NRSC mask in the early '90s, AM Broadcast stations had no upper limit. Well, they did have an upper freq limit spec as I recall. It was 7.5 kHz. When we ordered BC quality loaded lines from telco years ago it was 7.5 kHz for AM and 15 kHz for FM. I can see the correlation now with the later NRSC roll-off filters. Before NRSC the 7.5 kHz spec was probably enough protection for adjacent stations. The NRSC mask now effectivelylimits the audio passband to approximately 9.5 kHz....and the service still sounds poor despite attempts by broadcast stations andreceiver manufacturers to improve the quality. AM quality today is really a lot better, with tailored processing and PDM modulation. (up to +125%) If the listener has a good quality RX it's not bad.....And..... for "talk radio," including sibilant sounds, 7.5 kHz (or 9.5) is more than enough. (I'm sure the majority are tired of this subject now.... I'm quitting before the flames arise!) :-) Perry w8au |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RE: [TenTec] limited Orion reviews?, tlogan7 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] limited Orion reviews?, Duane Grotophorst |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] Enhanced SSB, RON ZOND |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Enhanced SSB, Terry Gaiser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |