| To: | Art Searle <w2nra@birdsandbeacons.com>, tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] PTT vs QSK? |
| From: | Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:41:17 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Art Searle wrote: > So, Why wouldn't computer keyed QSK with QSK amp > be the best contest station? Sure it would. On the other hand, a manufacturer that forces you to buy a new amplifer so that he can save 5 cents on PTT is probably missing something. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, Sinisa Hristov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, Rick Westerman |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] PTT vs QSK?, Rick Westerman |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] PTT vs QSK?, Rick Westerman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |