| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review |
| From: | Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:37:42 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
tongaloa wrote: > PTT is one way to skin the cat. > How about an amp that handles the sequencing? How about a ham who invested $3500 in Orion, and is unable to invest a similar amount in a "compatible" amplifier? On the other hand, the real cost (if any) of providing (ore rathet preserving) PTT for CW operation is measured in cents. Shouldn't common sense prevail? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] PTT vs QSK?, tongaloa |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] PTT vs QSK?, Sinisa Hristov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, tongaloa |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, Rick Westerman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |