[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Thoughts about the "Windom" or OCF antenna

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Thoughts about the "Windom" or OCF antenna
From: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:12:49 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Mario and the group,  with all due respect,
As I replied privately to Sinisa, and you; Dr. Cebik has built many of his
models and the built up antennas performed exactly to the model.

Dr. Cebik is one of the leading antenna experts of the ARRL.   Branko was a
pioneer in his day; but new concepts and improved understanding have
revolutionized the antennas of today when you examine the professional
literature of the Antennas and Propagation Group of the IEEE and other
groups internationally.  Some, such as the CFA are controversial, others
obey all the equations of Maxwell and have been efficiency proven such as
Dr. Robert L. Rogers, FLEX Folded Conical Helical Monopole, a local
invention here.  Antennas are not the sole purview of the EE, as Physicists
like Dr. Rogers are proving.  And Bob is a ham.

The proper use of the antenna mathematics proves the author, not his
original PhD.
Stuart Rohre

TenTec mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>