TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Unfinished

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Unfinished
From: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:08:20 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
    Sinisa:

        In general, I think that you are correct.  ALL COMPANIES should meet
their specs, but, sadly, few do.  This applies across the board, not just to
ham radios.

        But, I am satisfied with my Orion.  Otherwise, I would have sent it
back or sold it.

            73,


            Bernard, WA4OEJ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sinisa Hristov" <shristov@ptt.yu>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Unfinished


> WD4K wrote:
>
> > Transition with improvement is good, finished is not.
>
>
> In good old days a product had to perform according
> to its published and advertised description.
>
> Looks like we cannot expect anything like that anymore.
>
>
> 73,
>
> Sinisa  YT1NT, VA3TTN
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>