| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] An example of changing Orion firmware to meet expectations of the operator. |
| From: | "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Thu, 08 Jul 2004 09:19:49 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> -- VFO's are not receivers -- I kind of liked this idea. It was simple to grasp after a few minutes of taking the time to understand it. As someone else pointed out yesterday, there are good reasons for bandwidth and/or pbt and even mode NOT to automatically transfer, and for a VFO to be just a VFO as it was originally conceived. Now I suppose that once all the cooks have added their bit of sasoning to the soup I'm going to have to relearn how to use the radio, since it will be THEIR radio and not MINE, unless all of this is menu selectable as options. I suspect that not everyone buys into the traditionalist view of what switching VFOs ... uh .. receivers ... uh .. VFOs? what? I'm confused just thinking about it. :-) (It was good the way it was) Grant/NQ5T |
| Previous by Date: | AW: [TenTec] Orion T/R switching and S-Meter issue.., Christoph Rheker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] An example of changing Orion firmware to meet expectationsof the operator., Sinisa Hristov |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] An example of changing Orion firmware to meet expectations of the operator., Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] An example of changing Orion firmware to meet expectationsof the operator., Sinisa Hristov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |