TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] An example of changing Orion firmware to meet expectations

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] An example of changing Orion firmware to meet expectations of the operator.
From: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:57:40 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Scott,

> -- VFO's are not receivers --

How does one define what is a property of the VFO and what is the property
of the receiver?

I would assume from the design that BW and PBT are functions of the receiver
that the VFO should be limited to frequency setting. If that is the case,
why does the tuning step size appear to be a function of the receiver?  In
fact this can result in some confusion (which tuning step size to use) when
both receivers are tied to the same VFO.

73,
Mark


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>