TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits

To: <farson@shaw.ca>, <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits
From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:30:08 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Well thanks for your explanation Adam. For sure, if I had been living in a
cave for the past sixty-five years, I would not have known about commercial
applications of CW. I just didn't understand what your comment had to do
with the thread that was being discussed.

Tom

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Farson" <farson@shaw.ca>
To: "'Tommy'" <aldermant@alltel.net>; <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 5:58 PM
Subject: RE: [TenTec] omni v short dits


> Hi Tom,
>
> I used the term "commercial" intentionally, to point out that there are
> indeed instances (not necessarily in amateur radio)  where digital modes
> other than Morse "work better" than Morse in radio communications.
>
> Cheers for now, 73,
> Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>