| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment |
| From: | "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:05:15 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Omni 6+ agc set for fast. ProII's agc set for 1.2 decay time. Changing the agc setting on the Pro makes no difference in the click artifacts. Steve N4LQ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 5:35 PM Subject: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment > What were AGC setings on tested radios? > > 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU > > _______________________________________________ > TenTec mailing list > TenTec@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this being covered here, Marijan Miletic, S56A |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment, Barry N1EU |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment, Marijan Miletic, S56A |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment, Barry N1EU |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |