TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment

To: <barry@mxg.com>, <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment
From: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:23:42 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Not actually. First of all....The clicks aren't necessairly really there.
The Icom is producing the noise on it's own. Second...The clicks can either
distract, confuse or cover up a desired signal. During a crowded contest
situation with many strong signals, I hear a lot of clicks. Like I said, I
used to write it off as key clix from bad transmitters until I ran this
little test.
Loud is only good if what you want to hear....is loud.

Steve N4LQ
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>
To: "'Alfred Lorona'" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 7:50 PM
Subject: RE: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment


> Couldn't be that the ICOM is just able to hear better?
> Loud is good, louder is better?
>
> Barry, W5GN
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>