TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range

To: "tentec@contesting.com" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>,tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:55:08 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:34:55 -0500, Jim Brown wrote:

One point I forgot to address. The K2 is not as easy to operate as the Omni or 
746 
families. The original post correctly noted, for example, that the DSP system 
scores 
very poorly for user-friendliness. It isn't easy to use if you know how to use 
it. 

BUT: the DSP works so well that you can set it and forget it. Also, it is so 
versatile that 
has settings that match all operating conditions very well. So an operator who 
understands how to use it simply chooses the appropriate settings and they 
don't need 
to be changed.  

On Field Day, a good operator needs only a few controls -- the tuning knob, the 
crystal 
filter switch, RIT, gain controls, and maybe the speed key for the keyer.  And, 
of course, 
he/she needs to know how to change bands and load the antennas (which ought to 
be 
resonant). All of these are VERY simple on the K2, just as they are on the Omni 
series. 
Anything else that he/she is trying to change probably shouldn't be changed if 
it was set 
up correctly to begin with! 

One other point. A study of ARRL test reports on receiver performance and 
transmitter 
cleanliness will quickly reveal that the Jupiter is simply NOT in the same 
class with the 
Omni V and later radios.  Neither is the 746 or 746 Pro. 


Jim Brown  K9YC


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>