I think his remarks are most appreciated right here...where the question was
asked. In addition, his input makes good sense. Yes, Ten Tec will quickly
help when your tuning mechanism stiffens up, or something needs fixin. I've
used Ten Tec service, and it is quite good. However, I've owned YaeComWoods
since the '70s...dozens of them. Never had more than a bulb go dead...and
only a couple of them!
...Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "JOHN" <ku3g@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re Please tell me about the TT Omni VI+
> Hi Rob, if your happy with your kenwood and yaesu rigs thats great, just
try and repair that kenwood or ask kenwood a question in regards to
something that may seem a little bit oa a nusiance or whatever too you. Oh
they'll respond alright with an e-mail their answer is genaerally do a
reset. I have had both rigs you mentioned and they can't hold a candle to
the omni 6 . My suggestion to you is to get on their reflectors where your
remarks might be appreciated, even better buy an omni 6 and see what your
missing. Oh by the way if you want great audio go on AM .
> 73 john ku3g
>
> "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Scott, W4PA, seems to have taken issue with some of my advice to a ham
> asking about the wisdom of an Omni VI purchase. Now Scott you are a nice
> fellow, but you are also in the business of selling Ten Tec rigs. I think
> my comments were reasonable and fair and I stand by them. You may focus on
> measurement numbers for receiver performance tests which I notice folks on
> this list seem to do often, but I submit these do not tell the whole tale
> when it comes to overall transceiver performance, build quality,
reliability
> and modern convenience. For example, as an SSB operator, the questioning
> ham may find a transmit monitor, so he can hear himself through his
> headphones when transmitting, convenient. This is something lacking with
> the Omni VI. Let us suppose the receiver specs on the Omni VI indicate
> performance that is superior to the Kenwood and Yaesu rigs I mentioned. I
> doubt if the difference is noticable, or noticable most of the time. Since
> I'm interested in merely helping someone and am no more than a ham with a
> computer and an opinion, I do not desire to become involved in some sort
of
> protracted nit picking debate. I will simply respond to the comments to
> date: It is true that I stated at some point in the past that some
> problems with Ten Tec rigs (the Omni VI may have been the topic however I
> have also heard of RF in audio difficulties with the Jupiter) were
probably
> due to installation errors. I doubt if that has changed. On the other
> hand, I do think the current JA gear seems to be more robust at dealing
with
> RF coming into the rig from unwanted sources. For example, I can pop off
> the cover on my TS870 and find ferrite chokes on the dc supply leads
inside
> the rig. I don't recall seeing anything like that on my Omni VI and
Corsair
> II. If I am mistaken please correct me. Perhaps things have changed.
> Until then I make no apologies for having an evolving opinion.
>
> While the hamfest price reductions are nice, they do this fellow whom I
> assume was not there, little good. What are the current factory direct
used
> prices?
> Re the Google audio search: A google search of some topic hardly proves
> anything. I can search for NASA Moon Landing Hoax and get a lot of hits.
> Does that make it true?
>
> As for the INRAD audio mod, if you already have an Omni VI and you don't
> want to buy a new rig, the mod is better than nothing in the sense that it
> offers some improvment. However if someone is starting from scratch there
> are options out there using DSP beyond noise reduction that offer several
> different frequency response ranges that are not possible with the Omni VI
> available IF xtal filters. However, since this is not what the original
> questioner was interested in, and it is he whom I wish to stay focused on,
I
> will not belabor this point.
>
> 73,
> Rob/K5UJ
>
> p.s. note to anyone attempting the INRAD mod: I advise removing the stock
> carrier null pots (I think they are R7 and R8) and installing 20 turn trim
> pots (Mouser is one source, about $2.50 ea.) as they make finding the null
> much easier when you have the carrier right up against the 2.8 KHz filter
> skirt, and they hold the null longer.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|