TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion Processing

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion Processing
From: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:07:29 -0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Bernard

The aim of the kernel rewrite is to utilise more efficiently the hardware
resources already available in Orion.

At least, that is my understanding.

73 Bob, 5B4AGN

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 4:26 AM
Subject: [TenTec] Orion Processing


>     I don't know if I have seen the numbers (operating speed, etc.) for
the Orion's processor and DSP chips/ units.  Does anyone have them?  Since
this design is probably going on 3 years old, what capabilities do the newer
processors and DSPs have?  If you believe in Moore's law, then the speed
should be 2-4 times faster.  I'm also wondering if the newer processors and
DSPs are pin for pin compatible with the current ones.
>
>     Why am I curious?
>
>     Well, there has been some discussion on this board about a complete
rewrite of the code, version 2.XXXXX.  It could be that the new code will
run "better" with faster processors, or, maybe, need better processors.
And, a faster set of processors just may "solve" some of the problems with
the sweep, and add a little more capability elsewhere.
>
>     Just sort of thinking out loud.
>
>             73,
>
>
>             Bernard, WA4OEJ
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>