TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 08:43:01 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
 
>          Grant, this seems to be a common misconception since 
> someone on the Yahoo FT-9000 reflector made almost the 
> identical comment..

You're right -- I wasn't thinking about the swept results in the Expanded
Report.  

Wouldn't be a bad thing if narrower spaced numbers were included in the main
report, too, though, since 2Khz spacing is more or less a defacto standard
as the ranking comparison for some of the other testing gurus.

Grant/NQ5T


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>