I am curious about the SDR 1000. Since no hardware/software is ever done
right forever as technology marches forward is this approach more
reasonable/practical than the Ten Tec hardware/firmware route ?
Granted that both will suffer from obsolescence given time it seems that the
Ten Tec route may be able to preserve more of your economic value. Used
TenTec rigs would have a depreciated value that I believe would be greater
than that of a software defined rig. That given the fully software defined
rig may have more features and user adjustments than a hardware/firmware
version.
Interesting thoughts
Ed W3ETC
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of John Merrill
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:49 PM
To: roncasa@verizon.net; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] What's going on with the O2?
I'm buying an SDR1000 which i know is never done right :-).
On Oct 13, 2005, at 1:42 PM, ron wrote:
> yes, I think the Orion was done right. They made a honest attempt to
> manufacture a good radio. (smile)
>
> Ron wb1hga
>
> John Merrill wrote:
>
>> Do you think the OrionI was done right?
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|