TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] QST Reviews

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] QST Reviews
From: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Reply-to: na9u@arrl.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:57:08 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I don't think its the lawsuits they are worried about.
 I think its the next full page ad order to come in. 

73,
John NA9U

--- Bill Ogden <wogden@attglobal.net> wrote:

> The lawyers are working on making "plain language"
> bad reviews risky. This is not limited to ham gear
> or publications.  Unfortunately, we need to spend
> more time reading between the lines --- and
> reviewers need to spend more time writing with this
> in mind. With a little thoughtful effort a reviewer
> can turn "faint praise" into useful information.
> 
> Bill  W2WO
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>