TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR
From: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 23:12:34 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I will say in defense of the NR on v2.031, there is a substantial difference
in the noise floor between the settings 1 through 9. The noise almost
disappears at 9. However, the artifacts in the receive audio undo this
benefit.

On 3/2/06, Douglas Shock <douglas.shock@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's time to bring Doug back for a short blip.
>
>  On 3/2/06, Kc9cdt@aol.com <Kc9cdt@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Doug,
> > A very good post!
> > Yes, I believe they are trying.
> > Yes, I think they need beta testers as it seems they do not have the
> > resourse
> > to do the testing.
> >
> > What a great radio, it just needs to work the way we all know it can!
> > I know TT knows how it should work (Omni IV+ and many other great
> > radios)
> > It just seems they are not on top of the details. I wander who is doing
> > the
> > testing. Being a software engineer myself, I don't think programmers
> > should
> > test there own work.
> >
> > I am confident TT had a great group of beta testers on the original O
> > project, maybe they could help again?
> >
> > 73,
> > Lee
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>