| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] Lousy eham review |
| From: | "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 04 Jul 2006 02:05:13 +0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
|
I read that one a day or two ago. At the time I thought it probably came
from an inexperienced ham. Could be wrong but to me that's the way it
looked. I'm not a big jupiter fan but this kind of review is not useful. rob / k5uj _________________________________________________________________ Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review, K7wpz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review, Ron Notarius W3WN |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Lousy eham review, Phil Chambley, Sr. |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |