TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...."

To: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...."
From: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com>
Reply-to: gsm@mendelson.com,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:43:15 +0300
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 07:30:14AM -0500, GARY HUBER wrote:
> Regarding "highly technical programming such as an ORION II"; after spending 
> twenty years in R&D of Telecom and RF applications, I agree... it takes lots 
> of money for  highly competent programmer teams to get working a product 
> with minimal bugs out of the lab and into the market. See 
> http://www.csm-gh.com/projects.htm for examples of beta tests and 
> "controlled introductions" with communications industry R&D teams. Seemingly 
> no new software product is without bugs or runs as expected outside the R&D 
> lab.

The usual metric for programing complex systems is TWO testers per programmer.
Sytems that require 99.999% (the infamous five nines) reliability) often
need THREE to FOUR.

Geoff.
-- 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel gsm@mendelson.com  N3OWJ/4X1GM
IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667  Fax ONLY: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 
Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>