| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian.... |
| From: | "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com> |
| Reply-to: | John Vickers <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:21:56 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "OE3ZK Gert" <oe3zk@aon.at> > P.S.: I primarily do not judge "good" radios by "numbers" given in the > test reviews.....Lab testing does not find all the problems... > Nor do I, Gert. But, the numbers keep me from wasting my time and money on radios that don't have even a slight chance of pleasing me. Especially when those numbers are confirmed by more than one source. 73, WA4TT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] On being a contrarian, Douglas Shock |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...., Martin Ewing |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...., Martin Ewing |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...., John Sheeley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |