TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] On being a contrarian

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] On being a contrarian
From: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 13:06:59 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Seems like he might have read the news group as he suggested potential
owners do. I thought it was spot on the money. I do agree though that this
same review technique should be applied against other vendors as well
though. It's just a shame they started with the Orion which I don't think
tentec deserved.



On 8/1/06, K4IA@aol.com <K4IA@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Well said.  I just thought the review was out of character with  the
> normal
> positive slant you see in QST reviews.  If QST is initiating a  new policy
> of
> critical reviews, I am all for it.  But if the reviewer was  just in a bad
> mood
> when he wrote this review, then it is unfortunate.
>
> k4ia
> Craig  "Buck"
> Fredericksburg, Virginia USA
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>