| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] [Fwd: FCC ELIMINATES CW EXAM] |
| From: | "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:49:19 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
It's all right here: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.pdf Bob NW8L On 12/16/06, AD5VJ Bob <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net> wrote: That brings up a good point. Some entity somewhere had to "push" through the no code. I don't think this was just an idea someone at the FCC office had in a dream one night and spent the governments money to fulfill it. So that being said, I for one would sincerely like to know, what was the argument that won and what was the strength of the argument? 73 fer nw es gud DX, QSL VIA: BUR, LotW, e-QSL Bob AD5VJ(AAR6VM) Old calls: WY5L/KH3-KE5CTY-N5IET http://www.ad5vj.com/ Member: CTDXCC, NTCC, STXDXCC FISTS: # 12637, SKCC# 2369 10X# 37210, FP#-1141 SMIRK#-5177, RARS #-149 |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] WTT: Orion, AD5VJ Bob |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] [Fwd: FCC ELIMINATES CW EXAM], AD5VJ Bob |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] [Fwd: FCC ELIMINATES CW EXAM], AD5VJ Bob |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] [Fwd: FCC ELIMINATES CW EXAM], AD5VJ Bob |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |