| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 963 Current Overload Protection ? |
| From: | "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Jan 2007 08:56:23 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Best thing is to check with TT itself, They know what they have done with
each supply and rig.
My own preference is to use the 963 supply as it will cut off easily on over current, Had a couple instances when I was on 160 M and got off my center frequency too far, the 963 would shut down before I noticed the mistake, the Astron 35M would have kept delivering current till the finals became the fuse.... Best wishes, Rich K5SF From: Mykeyw9@aol.com Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> To: tentec@contesting.com Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 963 Current Overload Protection ? Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:18:46 EST In a message dated 1/7/2007 7:20:36 PM US Mountain Standard Time, W3ETC@comcast.net writes: I have read a couple of posts about Power Supplies and overload protection. I am using my Orion with an Astron SS-30M and so far no issues. Would I be better to switch to the TenTec 963, which I also have available but currently do not have in service ? Does it have the overload protection that others are talking about ? I think the TenTec power supplys do have overload protection. That's whytheir rigs don't. Better check this out but I would think one would be betteroff to use theirs. Mike W9UQB/7 _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec _________________________________________________________________Your Hotmail address already works to sign into Windows Live Messenger! Get it now http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://get.live.com/messenger/overview |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 963 Current Overload Protection ?, David H. Walker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Strange De-sense of Orion II, Paul Rubin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 963 Current Overload Protection ?, David H. Walker |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] A grounding question, Mike Bryce |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |