TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Class A

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Class A
From: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:05:11 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Well, I wonder how they do a lot of things....

----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Class A


Hmmm... I wonder how the contesters send cw?

K9MI


----- Original Message ----- From: "Dennis OConnor" <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 13 47
Subject: [TenTec] Class A


In my worthless opinion, keyboard CW isn't "CW". It may sound like CW, it
may meet the international definition of CW as an emission type, but it's
nothing more than some schmuck typing on a keyboard.
*******************************************************************

 Hmm, so how is he reading the CW - computer or ears?
 This could open a whole new can of worms... If keyboard generated CW
isn't real CW, then is keyer paddle CW real CW?  Or is only CW generated
by my pounding on a straight key CW?
 And if only brass pounding is real CW, then maybe only sparks flying off
the key from a rotary spark gap is the only "real" CW... <cept spark is
not continuous wave, hmmmm>  Questions, questions...

 denny / k8do

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>