To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion |
From: | "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sun, 6 May 2007 17:29:46 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> The sub > receiver in > the OII is a sub, not > As capable receiver as the main. The K3 sub receiver should > be called a > co-receiver, since it is identical > To the main one. That is true, but it is still an extra cost option, which was the point, I think. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion V2.060b Comments, Michael W Elliott |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New Orion II firmware, STEVEN KLINE |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion, Mike Short |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion, K4IA |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |