On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 21:58 -0400, John Rippey wrote:
> I'm intrigued by the lack of comments on the July QST review of the
> OMNI VII.
>
> It's a very good radio, if a bit pricey, for everyday ham use, and I
> would have thought there would be discussion of the review and lab
> results. Not so.
>
> Is it because the radio has no appeal to participants in this list?
> Can it be that the radio's major appeal is to computer-bound folks
> who want to operate remotely?
>
> That's certainly the theme of Ten-Tec's advertising, at least.
>
The reveiw was discussed quite a bit when it first appeared on the ARRL
web page a few weeks ago.
73, Jerry, K0CQ
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|