TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Lowest loss matching an antenna for my Argonaut 509

To: <geraldj@storm.weather.net>, "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Lowest loss matching an antenna for my Argonaut 509
From: "Bill Ames" <billa@aob.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 11:41:06 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Then the question would be, if I selected the right materials (torrid and
wire) and a proper design (number of turns, etc.) then would this be the
least loss matching device? If yes, what material and design would be best?

Bill

KB1LG

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Dr. Gerald N. Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 11:31 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Lowest loss matching an antenna for my Argonaut 509

On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 11:15 -0400, Bill Ames wrote:
> Would the problem with the torrid be that the core might saturate and that
> is where the loss would come from?
> 
> Bill
> KB1LG
> 
Ferrite always has some loss. Its the trade off between high
permeability (and hence compact transformer or balun) and loss. Driven
to saturation, the loss (and harmonic distortion) increases very much.
For a given permeability, cores from different makers will have
different losses and thresholds of saturation.

73, Jerry, K0CQ

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>