TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner
From: "Chris Hinson" <chinson1@mindspring.com>
Reply-to: chinson1@mindspring.com, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:17:55 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Sorry I mean the 238B just a error
73s  Chris K4osk


> [Original Message]
> From: JT Croteau <jt.n1ese@gmail.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Date: 5/21/2009 10:11:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Chris Hinson <chinson1@mindspring.com>
wrote:
> > Out of all three The Ten-Tec 138B performs the best. The TT 138B
matches my
> > antennas the best giving me the lowest SWR. on 160-10 meters
>
> Lowest SWR doesn't always equate to the best match.  Also, do you mean
> to say 238B?  There's no such thing as a 138B.
>
> -- 
> JT Croteau, N1ESE
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>