| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner | 
| From: | JT Croteau <jt.n1ese@gmail.com> | 
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> | 
| Date: | Thu, 21 May 2009 10:10:33 -0400 | 
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> | 
| On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Chris Hinson <chinson1@mindspring.com> wrote: > Out of all three The Ten-Tec 138B performs the best. The TT 138B matches my > antennas the best giving me the lowest SWR. on 160-10 meters Lowest SWR doesn't always equate to the best match. Also, do you mean to say 238B? There's no such thing as a 138B. -- JT Croteau, N1ESE _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner, Chris Hinson | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner, Chris Hinson | 
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner, Chris Hinson | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner, Chris Hinson | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |