To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner |
From: | JT Croteau <jt.n1ese@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Thu, 21 May 2009 10:10:33 -0400 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Chris Hinson <chinson1@mindspring.com> wrote: > Out of all three The Ten-Tec 138B performs the best. The TT 138B matches my > antennas the best giving me the lowest SWR. on 160-10 meters Lowest SWR doesn't always equate to the best match. Also, do you mean to say 238B? There's no such thing as a 138B. -- JT Croteau, N1ESE _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner, Chris Hinson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner, Chris Hinson |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner, Chris Hinson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner, Chris Hinson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |