Well it depends on how you define superb ssb but for me the k3 is
leaps beyond in both recieve and tx. Your milage could vary though.
Sent from my iPhone 3gs
On Nov 11, 2009, at 7:58 PM, kc9cdt@aol.com wrote:
>
> It is my understanding that the K3 is a superb CW rig...but not even
> in the same ballpark as OII for SSB???
> Am I missinformed?
> 73,
> Lee, KC9CDT
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas Shock <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wed, Nov 11, 2009 6:09 pm
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Final Firmware O2
>
>
>
> that is correct...
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Philip C. Anderson
> xtraham58@hotmail.com>wrote:
>>
> Not that it matters to me, but it is my understanding that ON4UN is
> now
> using 2 loaded K'3s.
>
>> From: marsh@ka5m.net
>> To: tentec@contesting.com; douglas.shock@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:10:27 -0600
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Final Firmware O2
>>
>> Douglas,
>>
>> What is your source of information for your following statement?
>>
>> "If it was such a great and finished product then why did most if
>> not all
> of
>> the Ham Radio's Top contest-DX operators bail on TenTec?"
>>
>> What did they bail to?
>>
>> The National Contest Journal July/August 2009 Volume 37 Number 4
>> contains
> an
>> extensive article on "Choosing an HF Radio for Serious Contesting and
>> DXing". Of the four (4) transceivers the author picks, the Ten-Tec
>> ORION
> II
>> is one of them.
>>
>> I'm not convinced that I've ever missed a DX or contest QSO that I
>> could
>> have worked if I had been using something better than my ORION II.
>>
>> 73,
>> Marsh, KA5M
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:
> tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
>> On Behalf Of Douglas Shock
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:02 AM
>> To: Scott Harwood; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Final Firmware O2
>>
>> Whiners? Do you really feel that was required Scott? So your level of
>> expectation on a delivered product is different than others. I
>> personally
>> find no fault in OI-OII owners holding TenTec's feet to the fire on
>> the
>> marketing campaign they used for both radios. that hardly makes me a
> whiner.
>> If it was such a great and finished product then why did most if
>> not all
> of
>> the Ham Radio's Top contest-DX operators bail on TenTec? Maybe they
>> knew
>> something you don't?
>>
>> Sure, in its base form it is a fair radio. But face the facts
>> man...you
>> really believe they got the firmware right? And to release a beta
>> with
>> enhancements that in themselves are broke but no fixes and then are
>> never
>> heard from again? Sounds like the joke is on the operator if you
>> support
>> this business practice.
>>
>> So drive on if you still drink the TenTec coolaid or just find it
> necessary
>> to defend your spent monies. But respect the rights of others
>> homie...
>>
>> Hiding behind your keyboard with big mouth and no accountability is
>> not a
>> good thing.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Scott Harwood
>> <scotthsr@earthlink.net>wrote:
>>
>>> I couldn't have said it better, Dennis.
>>>
>>> Good job. I hope enough "whiners" read it.
>>>
>>> Palstar does have great stuff. I have two tuners. They could
>>> improve on
>>> answering emails, though.
>>>
>>> Scott K4VWK
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
>>>> Sent: Nov 11, 2009 8:37 AM
>>>> To: tentec@contesting.com
>>>> Subject: [TenTec] Final Firmware O2
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm, some of you need to cut back on the coffee...
>>>>
>>>> The O2 is a fine radio, well positioned in the upper reaches of ham
> radio
>>> transceivers...
>>>> The biggest whine I see is that they are not producing enough
>>>> firmware
>>> changes to make you happy..
>>>> It appears that some believe the K3 radio with its rapid parade of
>>> firmware revisions is somehow superior because it needs frequent
> revising
>> -
>>> this does not bespeak superior, to me; adaptable maybe, a secondary
> hobby
>> in
>>> it's own right, but not necessarily superior......
>>>>
>>>> Then I read the moaning about the O2 sweep; and they didn't do
>>>> this,
> they
>>> didn't do that, etc...
>>>> Last time I checked the ads the K3 does not have a sweep
>>>> screen... But
>>> somehow, not having a sweep screen makes it the superior radio,
>>> because
>>> Orion is not upgrading its sweep screen fast enough - the logic of
>>> that
>>> escapes me...
>>>> If you want a radio with a fancy sweep screen get a Pro III...
>>>> If you want an even fancier sweep screen get an LP PAN for your
>>>> Orion
> /
>>> K3...
>>>>
>>>> If you want an even fancier radio get one of the $11K to $13K
>>>> models
>> from
>>> the land of the rising sun - but don't expect the factory to
>>> answer the
>>> phone and put the technician that built and aligned your radio on
>>> the
>> phone
>>> to talk you through a problem - which both Orion and Elecraft do
>>> routinely...
>>>>
>>>> I happen to have the O2... I have looked hard at the K3 with the
>>>> more
>>> capable sub receiver - as recently as 2 weeks ago... But, the less
>>> desirable ergonomics of the radio outweigh the receiver advantage
>>> and I
>>> opted to stay with the Orion for the third year... The O2 has the
>>> best
>>> combination of receiver and ergonomics I have found in 45 years of
>>> ham
>>> radio...
>>>>
>>>> Lastly, I am thrilled to have Ten Tec and Elecraft slugging it
>>>> out in
> the
>>> ham radio arena... A vast improvement over the import radios that
>>> have
>>> dominated the ham business for some time..
>>>> And while I am mentioning US companies, let me point out that
>>>> PALSTAR
>>> acquired the Commander amplifiers and has put considerable time,
>> innovation,
>>> and money, into improving those amps until they appear to me, to
>>> be the
>> best
>>> amps in the business... They now have a complete line of tuners,
>>> meters
>> and
>>> high quality amps... You could do a lot worse than spend your ham
> dollars
>>> with them - and drive that amp with a new O2 or K3...
>>>>
>>>> denny / k8do
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Bing brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place.
>
> http://www.bing.com/search?q=restaurants&form=MFESRP&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MFESRP_Local_MapsMenu_Resturants_1x1
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> ______________________________________________
> enTec mailing list
> enTec@contesting.com
> ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|