TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OII more development

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OII more development
From: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:54:35 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
All the folks who have an idea of an ideal sweep, why don't you all put the energy you have in the lamentations of the state of development, into forming a users group and developer group who can reverse engineer a third party sweep accessory to your taste? Isn't that the traditional ham radio way?

If the rig does not have the knob you like, you find one and change it to suit. If the factory provided mike is not to your taste, you buy a third party mike. If the tuner does not do quite what you need, you build a new tuner for tuning everything from a dipole to a wet noodle.

Manufacturers such as MFJ saw a niche for accessories, and moved into that market. Elecraft came from two inspired designers who had been involved with the "usual" QRP radio kits, and they said why not offer a full featured radio kit? In the peak of the tube years post WW2, a number of ham radio manufacturers sprang up to fill the need for full featured radios that exceeded what a single ham could home brew.

I see the loss of a good programmer as a severe blow to any company today in the high tech equipment markets. I think companies should bite the bullet and have software teams so that if one goes away, there is continuity in the department. (Sadly, programmers today do not chart and document their work in the formalized way we were taught in the days of mainframes. And some software people have the knack for picking up what a program is doing and why, and many of us wish only for good hardware and to not have to decode some program).

Good luck to those who might seek to push the state of the art a bit more,

-Stuart Rohre
K5KVH





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>