Sinisa,
Why do think TT does not have that power roll back safety feature?
73,
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sun, Apr 25, 2010 1:22 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII vs. K3 ? Opinions invited.,
Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP <Rick@DJ0IP.de> wrote:
> If I run 100w on the Ten-Tec and 40 watts are reflected, then as you
say,
> the amp or antenna receive 60w.
> If my non TT rig reduces the power to 60w, due to high SWR, it is
putting
> out 60W but it is only driving the load with about 40w.
> Or is my thinking wrong?
Your thinking is correct, apart from those 40 W being actually 36 W (60
% of the
forward power).
The technical fact is that the only difference between a TenTec TX and,
say,
a Kenwood TX is lack of circuitry which reduces the power with high SWR.
The TenTec TX itself is in no way more capable, or more robust, or more
magical,
or anything else.
In fact, it has one safety feature less.
Inconvenience of TX power reduction with high SWR is of the the same
nature as the inconvenience of using seat belts in our cars.
It may be inconveniet at times, but it's safe.
73,
Sinisa
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|