TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons

To: Ten Tec Contesting <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons
From: Mike Gorniak <mgorniak@genesiswireless.us>
Reply-to: mgorniak@genesiswireless.us, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 20:56:18 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Everyone seems to have their own opinion about this, but I agree with 
you, Barry. I vary the receive bandwidth to compensate for changes in 
QRM and QRN , as well as to accommodate and enhance the frequency 
response characteristics of the station I am trying to copy. It's 
amazing how sometimes a small tweak can have a huge impact on 
intelligibility.  Having this flexibility reduces listening fatigue for 
me, whether it's a rag chew, contest or weak signal DX situation.

73, Mike NM7X

>I want the receiver to act as a faithful transducer with the freedom
>to shape the passband as I desire, not hard-wired to restrict that
>ability.

>73, Barry N1EU



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>