TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons
From: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:54:37 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Richards makes good points about how it feels to be a newer operator. We were all new once. And then later, we probably had some operating event that we were new at again, and again had to adapt. First Field Day,
first time as a DX station, etc.

Good experienced operators take the clue of how the contact op sounds to them. If they are hesitant or send CW slowly or speak slowly, the experienced op slows down his end also. I well remember a 4X4 I worked in a pile up. He was very efficient at making a contact, then he would say QRZ? and go on to the next station. A station called him very slowly and with hesitation. He slowed down his pace, and went back to the slow station. The overs were so slow, that in the break between them, others called in, and the 4X4 never missing a beat worked both stations, the fast one and the slower one. It was so seamless, you had to admire it. I am not sue the slower station even knew it had happened. But, I adapt my calling pattern to the length the DX station is using, or answering. Even adapt as to use or not use phonetics, how long a call to make, and of course call where he directs or was last listening. Some of these operating points cannot be enhanced by any audio feature of a rig, or signal processing, as they are all about timing of the calls, pace of the exchange, and the language skills of each operator.

Another time I broke a pile up of callers by knowing the native language of the DX station. Monitor QSOs before you attempt one, helps a lot in knowing how to make a contact.
-Stuart Rohre
K5KVH



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>