| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons |
| From: | Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:00:05 +0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> wrote: > The first reference writer clearly did not understand that for a > communications / ham receiver use, you do NOT want "High Fidelity", but > you want communications audio punch. This is achieved by NOT passing > alll audio frequencies > but limiting the audio to the voice band 300 to 3 KHz. I want punch on my transmitter, not my receiver, thank you very much. I want the receiver to act as a faithful transducer with the freedom to shape the passband as I desire, not hard-wired to restrict that ability. 73, Barry N1EU |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Working the Weak ONes, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons, Stuart Rohre |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |