TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons
From: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:03:15 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Russell,

Thanks for the links to comments about the Corsair audio.

I used a Corsair II that a friend had, and it was super on his favorite mode, CW. It sounded fine to me on SSB as well.

That said, there are better audio chips that could replace the Audio IC in the model. If that is too much conversion for you, simply change the audio coupling capacitors to reduce the high frequency response to the hiss. Particularly subject to failure is the series R and C network on the audio IC output pin to ground, that is supposed to limit high frequency response in older Audio ICs.

The first reference writer clearly did not understand that for a communications / ham receiver use, you do NOT want "High Fidelity", but you want communications audio punch. This is achieved by NOT passing alll audio frequencies but limiting the audio to the voice band 300 to 3 KHz. This was all proved in Acoustics back in the 1930's. Typically, you want smaller series coupling capacitors to alter the frequency range being passed to the speaker. And check that the aging speaker has not warped and thus is causing distortion if it has become off center, or the cone detaches from the edge mount.

The second reference has some useful suggestions to tailor transmit audio as well as receive audio in Corsairs.

The other contributor to hiss is the age of electrolytic capacitors in the Corsair or even Corsair II's if they have not been replaced in less than 5 years. You may find lack of filtering by original electrolytics. Any electrolytic such as used in ham radios has a limited lifetime. It probably will degrade slowly enough that the failure will not be evident until there is a large amount of hum or audio feedback, but it is worth checking if the filtering is adequate.

The Corsair II's are one of the most desirable older Ten Tec radios. That has been stated on this and other reflectors for many years.

Audio is very subjective to hams. You should try to listen to a radio you are considering, with both speaker and good quality communications headphones, to evaluate the audio fairly. Ensure you are not turning up RF gain too high and thus adding noise during a test. Sometimes on older radios, the correct RF gain is lower than where the S meter operates as you would expect. I tend to give S meter reports by my ear, as some rigs have a Scotch reading on the S meter. There were no clear standards for S meters back in the day of the Corsair. It seemed to do as well as other brands but it was not digital precision, since it was an analog circuit. I have seen hams who could not hear audio I could clearly hear on their radio. At Field Days, folks often miss calls I hear and work, because each of us has differing skills in "brain filtering" noise imposed upon a signal. Newer hams need to listen to HF bands for many hours and under differing conditions to condition their ears to optimum "Communications Quality", if they want to succeed with weak signal work.

-Stuart Rohre
K5KVH





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>