TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons
From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:00:05 +0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> wrote:

> The first reference writer clearly did not understand that for a
> communications / ham receiver use, you do NOT want "High Fidelity", but
> you want communications audio punch.  This is achieved by NOT passing
> alll audio frequencies
> but limiting the audio to the voice band 300 to 3 KHz.

I want punch on my transmitter, not my receiver, thank you very much.
I want the receiver to act as a faithful transducer with the freedom
to shape the passband as I desire, not hard-wired to restrict that
ability.

73, Barry N1EU
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>