TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec rebranding

from [Richards] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec rebranding
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 21:12:19 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
Sorry...  Good think you guys can sort this all out !
Anyway...  we seem to be on the same page.

======================  James -K8JHR  =======================

On 5/26/2010 4:30 PM, Dave Heil wrote:

>
> Geoffrey Mendelson did not write what you quote him as saying. I did.
>
>===========================================================
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TenTec] wither CW, Richards
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] wither CW, Richards
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec rebranding, Dave Heil
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec rebranding, Paul Gates
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]