TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] The Eagle

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle
From: "Charles Strickland" <wa4oss@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:01:43 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hey, I like this post, best in two days.  I have requested this long ago.  I 
have the Jupiter, Omni VII, and Orion II.  I would like to be able to 
connect to my RF Space SDR-IQ, use the software of my choice and play.  I am 
old, tired, don't see as well as in younger days, have a bad attitude, and 
don't want to bugger up a radio bringing out the IF.

Just having fun!


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle


>> I don't want to start a rhubarb over that here... just noting how
> many operators want one, and how TT should be well aware of it.
>
> The inclusion of the port is a no-brainer. It takes no R&D (yes, really),
> nearly zero manufacturing effort, and essentially no added cost and yet, 
> the
> I.F. port provides panadpter performance and a second Rx at a level that 
> far
> exceeds the internal scope abilities of the O2 and Omni VII, even if the
> latter had a real-time, continuous sweep.  It's a manufacturer's dream: a
> huge performance and marketing feature for nothing and an opportunity to
> beat-out the new TS-590 competition.
>
> Paul, W9AC
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Richards" <jruing@ameritech.net>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 6:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle
>
>
>> If there is just one, that is one more than the Eagle will allow.
>>
>> I think leaving off a pan adapter output on a $1800 rig is 
>> unconscionable.
>> I should not have to cobble one into the rig myself.
>>
>> I say this considering how so many Omni VII owners have
>> carped about not getting a real-time band scope one on their rigs,
>> especially considering TT promised that more than 3 years ago...
>>
>> I don't want to start a rhubarb over that here... just noting how
>> many operators want one, and how TT should be well aware of it.
>>
>> ============================== JHR  ========================
>>
>> On 9/26/2010 17:44, Bill Rowlett wrote:
>>>
>>> And just how many TS-590 owners are using those or even know what they
>>> are? Not half as many as some of you think I am sure.
>>>
>> =============================================================
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>