There are a lot more fundamentals in "Experimental Methods in RF Design
Revised First Edition" by Wes Hayward, W7ZOI, Rick Campbell, KK7B, and
Bob Larkin, W7PUA published by ARRL. I found a better price at Amazon.
And there are a lot of fundamentals in then ARRL Handbook any recent
edition.
73, Jerry, K0CQ
On 9/30/2010 2:57 PM, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP wrote:
> John,
>
> Yes, I guess it's not the right paper if you haven't been following RX
> performance for a while.
>
> You know, we all started out without any information on receivers and when I
> first got interested in them in the mid 70's, I was confused too. I read a
> few articles by Wes Hayward, W7ZOI. I think I might still have some of them
> somewhere.
>
> I read everything I could get ahold of, in English and in German.
> Eventually we reached a point where almost all radios had positive Intercept
> Points, and each new one seemed to be 1 or 2 dB more than the last. So we
> all started to ask, "How much do we need".
>
> Seems like this might be a good topic for a serious of "simple" articles for
> QST.
> I'm not sure who we could get to write them.
>
> Let me do some research for you. Maybe I can find something simpler to
> begin with.
>
> 73
> Rick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of John Molenda
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:10 PM
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle
>
> I went to
>
> _ by Peter E. Chadwick, G3RZP, and published in QEX_, as suggested and
> attempted to read the
> article I am sure it was a great read for a tech but for me the common guy
> who has other
> talents it was too much . I have little understanding of the theory needed
> to absorb
> such a technical article . This I believe is the same reason TT should drill
> any holes into
> the Eagle body to bring any connection out . John kb2huk
> May/June 2002.
>
>
> On 9/30/2010 1:19 PM, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP wrote:
>> by Peter E. Chadwick, G3RZP, and published in QEX,
>> May/June 2002.
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|