TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle

To: geraldj@weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle
From: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:58:03 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
  Thank you Jerry I will take a look I just ordered the new operating 
manual will see if any thing in that book addresses receiver issues .  
thanks John

On 9/30/2010 6:24 PM, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote:
> There are a lot more fundamentals in "Experimental Methods in RF Design
> Revised First Edition" by Wes Hayward, W7ZOI, Rick Campbell, KK7B, and
> Bob Larkin, W7PUA published by ARRL. I found a better price at Amazon.
> And there are a lot of fundamentals in then ARRL Handbook any recent
> edition.
>
> 73, Jerry, K0CQ
>
> On 9/30/2010 2:57 PM, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP wrote:
>> John,
>>
>> Yes, I guess it's not the right paper if you haven't been following RX
>> performance for a while.
>>
>> You know, we all started out without any information on receivers and when I
>> first got interested in them in the mid 70's, I was confused too.  I read a
>> few articles by Wes Hayward, W7ZOI.  I think I might still have some of them
>> somewhere.
>>
>> I read everything I could get ahold of, in English and in German.
>> Eventually we reached a point where almost all radios had positive Intercept
>> Points, and each new one seemed to be 1 or 2 dB more than the last.  So we
>> all started to ask, "How much do we need".
>>
>> Seems like this might be a good topic for a serious of "simple" articles for
>> QST.
>> I'm not sure who we could get to write them.
>>
>> Let me do some research for you.  Maybe I can find something simpler to
>> begin with.
>>
>> 73
>> Rick
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
>> On Behalf Of John Molenda
>> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:10 PM
>> To: tentec@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle
>>
>>     I went to
>>
>> _  by Peter E. Chadwick, G3RZP, and published in QEX_, as suggested and
>> attempted to read the
>> article I am sure it was a great read for a tech but for me the common guy
>> who has other
>> talents it was too much .  I have little understanding of the theory needed
>> to absorb
>> such a technical article . This I believe is the same reason TT should drill
>> any holes into
>> the Eagle body to bring any connection out . John kb2huk
>> May/June 2002.
>>
>>
>> On 9/30/2010 1:19 PM, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP wrote:
>>>     by Peter E. Chadwick, G3RZP, and published in QEX,
>>> May/June 2002.
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>