| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] F/S Tne Tec Orion II Model 566......Very good, but it doesn't do MARS |
| From: | Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:02:35 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
That's good. I'm not a CAP or MARS member, but I suspect that being
required to buy the more expensive equipment killed off HF operation at
the CAP squadron level. I guess that also keeps Ten Tec in the running
for MARS.
73,
Bob WB2VUF
On 10/14/2010 12:19 AM, w8au@sssnet.com wrote:
At 06:19 PM 10/13/2010, Bwana Bob wrote:I thought that all MARS gear now has to meet a 20 ppm, I think, NTIA frequency stability spec, which requires the purchase of commercial/military gear such as Harris or Motorola.There was talk of that two years ago. CAP now requires it, since a lot of their folks know nothing about radio adjustment. And maybe Army MARS was thinking of it, but the talk has died down...Nothing mentioned in the past year. Navy/Marine Corps MARS was not promoting it. Perry NNN0VNO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] eagle, Carl Winkles |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] eagle, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] .....Very good, but it doesn't do MARS, al sirois |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] F/S Tne Tec Orion II Model 566, Fernando |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |