20 May 2011
De
Nnn0wna@navymars.org
Or
alsirois@roadrunner.com
or
N1MHC@arrl.net
========================
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 8:07 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion III
Can do. Just let me know how far out of band you want to go on each end.
Take a look at my web site, www.n4yg.com.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Tock" <joseph.tock@gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 5:21 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion III
> My ideal OIII would include much of what has been discussed, but please
> make
> it MARS compatible, and not just around the band edges.
>
> I am a dedicated MARS member (with official orders) and operate on
> restricted frequencies and licensed to operate in both Iraq and
> Afghanistan. Without full MARS compatibility it is not in the realm of
> consideration.
>
> Thanks.
> 73
> K4RFS
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Frank Kirschner <KF6E@mail.com> wrote:
>
>> Listen to the NR on the FTdx-5000. It can pull a signal out of the noise
>> and make an unreadable signal readable, and a noisy signal armchair copy.
>> This works on SSB as well as CW. I don't know what algorithm they're
>> using,
>> but it really works.
>>
>> 73,
>> Frank
>> KF6E
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Carl Moreschi
>> Sent: 05/14/11 11:37 AM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion III
>>
>> The NR you are talking about does not exist on any radio. Still to this
>> day I have never seen an NR that truely helps with copy. They might make
>> things quieter but copy is always best under difficult conditions with NR
>> off. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Dr. Hays, NC 28635 www.n4py.com
>> On
>> 5/14/2011 11:12 AM, Tony Lelieveld wrote: > Hi all, > > I agree. I'd go
>> with
>> an external panadapter. Why are people rumbling about > an Orion III?
>> Let's
>> get the O-II finalized first. I am still waiting for > an upgrade that
>> will
>> improve the NR part of the rig. One that, when you > activate it, will
>> truly
>> reduce the noise WITHOUT altering the audio quality > of the voice you're
>> receiving. > > On some signals it seems to work okay but mostly it
>> distorts
>> the audio and > acts erratically and I am running ver. 2.044A. Different
>> settings of the > AGC threshold and manual AGC level do not seem to make
>> much difference. > > 73, Tony VE3DWI > > > ----- Original Message ----- >
>> From: "Barry N1EU"<
>> barry.n1eu@gmail.com> > To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"<
>> tentec@contesting.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 12:29 PM > Subject:
>> Re: [TenTec] O3 wish list > > >> Well said and totally agree Paul.
>> Limited
>> engineering resources can >> be put to much better use. If the rig mfr
>> provides I.F. output, >> they've done their job. >
>> _______________________________________________ > TenTec mailing list >
>> TenTec@contesting.com >
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec >
>> _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|