TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Correction

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Correction
From: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 01:14:47 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Actually I wondered that myself Geoff. The filter is stamped "282" and "48054" 
on the top of the crystals. 

Keith W8GX


On Jul 6, 2011, at 1:02 AM, geoffrey mendelson wrote:

> 
> On Jul 6, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Keith Hamilton wrote:
> 
>> Actually I am trying to reconcile the differences between the center  
>> frequency of the 500 Hz filter and the 250 Hz filter, both in the  
>> 6.3 mHz PB IF. The center frequencies should be the same -( 6.299250  
>> I think) regardless of the PBT control setting (11  or 1 o'clock) or  
>> the 9 mHz filter in use (I was using the 2.4 hz filter in the 9mhz  
>> IF at the time.) Since the center frequencies are not the same, (I  
>> must make a frequency adjustment to obtain maximum signal strength)  
>> I wanted to know if I can adjust the center frequency of my 250 hz  
>> filter or is the filter just too old and drifted. I would also like  
>> to know if others have experienced this discrepancy between two  
>> filters installed in their radio. Is it common for the older Ten Tec  
>> filters to go off frequency?
>> Thanks!  Keith W8GX
> 
> 
> Do you have an RTTY (as opposed to CW) filter?
> 
> Geoff.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Geoffrey S. Mendelson,  N3OWJ/4X1GM
> Making your enemy reliant on software you support is the best revenge.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>