TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Station power supply??

To: <k9yc@arrl.net>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Station power supply??
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:20:24 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jims point is well taken. This is one and the precice reason that I stress one must connect a ground wire from the radio ground terminal to the power supply ground terminal. DO NOT rely on the power supply negative lead and associated connectors to be of adequale of low resistance to keep the radio at zero volt potential.

So to summarize, to connect the radio to the power supply requires three wires: Positive, Negative, and Ground.

73
Bob, K4TAX



Bonding -12VDC to the chassis causes a problem when powering a SSB rig that SOUNDS like RFI, but is NOT RFI. W8JI pointed out this problem to me several years ago. Ohm's Law causes IR drop in both V+ and V- conductors that varies with SSB modulation. Nothing new. But when V- is bonded to the chassis, and when audio accessories are running from that same supply, the modulation of V- is added to the audio. That modulation SOUNDS like SSB in an AM detector -- it SOUNDS like RFI. But it's not. You can hear this modulation if you connect headphones between one end and the other of the V- conductor of your power supply wiring.

I have long advocated bonding chassis to chassis for all equipment in our ham shacks to minimize problems with hum, buzz, and RFI. This practice also reduces the above problem to the point where it is not audible. .

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>