TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II
From: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:18:05 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Gary,

Thanks!  My mistake was googling "anzac receiver design" and of course got
nothing useful.

73
Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of GARY HUBER
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 2:06 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II

The ANZAC mixer is a commonly used where a double balanced mixer is 
required. The Corsair / Corsair-II receiver MAY have used a mixer similar in

design to one of ANZAC's....

Google (ANZAC mixer)...


73 ES DX,
Gary -- AB9M

-----Original Message----- 
From: Michael Tortorella
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 12:00 PM
To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II

There have been several references recently to "AZNAC" (or is it "ANZAC"?)
receiver design.  Can someone please give a short review?  I tried google
but got no useful results.
Thanks and 73
Mike W2IY

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of ChasW3KC
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:13 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II

Gary AB9M posted:
> The CORSAIR-II, with its PTO and AZNAC type receiver design, may be one of

> the finest, quietest analog receivers ever built, at least by Ten-Tec...

Did the original Corsair employ the "AZNAC" design?
I read that the original Corsair used 4 discrete Schottky diodes in the
mixer and that the Corsair II used 4 monolithic Schottky diodes in the
mixer.

Also, looking at the Sherwood Receiver Test Data on the web, I see it only
lists data for the "Corsair" which would I would assume is the original
version (?).

Any insight would be appreciated.  Thanks.

73 Chas W3KC

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>